Possession & eviction

The court fee is £415. That is not what it costs you.

Everything else — the notice period, the hearing that every claim now needs, the wait for a bailiff — is months of rent you are not being paid, and you will recover about £530 of it from someone who by definition has no money. The calculator below works out the whole number: your grounds, your realistic date, your total cost, and the one figure no eviction firm will show you, which is what it would cost to pay them to leave instead.

No form first Nothing stored Every ground and notice period Free

What the calculator gives you

Five answers, immediately, with nothing asked of you first.

Your groundsWhich of the grounds are actually open to you, mandatory or discretionary, and the notice period each one carries
Your stageWhere you are in the process, what is behind you and what the next step is — with the weeks each remaining stage takes
Your blockersWhat will stop the claim dead. One of them changed in May and almost nobody has noticed
Your real costFees, enforcement, legal costs and lost rent, less what is actually recoverable — which is far less than people expect
Your break-evenWhat you could pay the tenant to go tomorrow and still be better off than going to court
Read this before you instruct anybody, including us

1. We do not issue or run possession claims, and nor should any unregulated firm. In Baxter v Doble the High Court looked at an unregulated eviction firm’s work “in the round” — drafting the papers, the witness statements, the applications, instructing the advocate, running the correspondence — and held that together it amounted to conducting litigation, even though the landlord was nominally acting in person and the firm never went on the record. That is an offence under the Legal Services Act carrying up to two years on indictment, and a contempt of court. The firm escaped sanction only through a defence that depended on the law being unsettled at the time. It is settled now.

2. Nobody regulates eviction firms. Possession is not one of the six claims-management sectors, so no eviction company is authorised for it, and none is regulated by the solicitors’ or barristers’ regulators unless it has chosen to be. The Legal Services Act is the only thing holding the line. If a firm offers to take your eviction from start to finish for a fixed fee and is not a firm of solicitors, ask them which regulator they answer to. The honest answer is usually none.

3. So we do the half that decides the outcome, and hand the rest to a solicitor. Serving a notice is not a reserved activity. Neither is checking your compliance, building the evidence, or negotiating a surrender — and that is where these cases are won and lost. The common reasons a claim fails are a defective notice, a deposit problem and thin evidence, not the court queue. We do that part properly and pass a bundle to a regulated firm who can actually issue it. You pay a solicitor once, for the part that needs one.

Work out what possession actually costs you

Nothing is sent anywhere and nothing is stored. The panel rebuilds as you answer, and it will tell you plainly when the answer is that you should not be going to court at all.

1 — The property and the money
2 — Why do you want possession
Choose the main reason. The panel will show you every ground that fits, because the resilient approach is to plead more than one.
3 — How far along are you
Be honest about this — if a notice was served on the wrong form or with the wrong expiry date, the clock has not started.
4 — Compliance
Tick what is true and evidenced. This section decides whether you have a claim at all, and it is the section people skim.
5 — Anything that changes the odds
What possession will actually cost you

Start with the rent and the reason

Every figure below is built from what you enter. The court fee is the smallest part of it, and lost rent is almost always the largest.

—Total cost of going the court route
—Realistic weeks from today until you have the keys
—Earliest realistic date you get the property back
Where you are, and what is left
The arithmetic in full
The number no eviction firm will show you

Work through the calculator to see it

This is an estimate, not advice on your case, and it is not a substitute for a solicitor. It applies the published notice periods, court fees and possession statistics to what you tell it. It cannot read your tenancy agreement, see your evidence, or know what a district judge will do on the day. The court timings are the last published medians and they pre-date the May 2026 reforms — they are weighted by paper-based claims that no longer exist for private landlords, so the real figure is likely to be longer, not shorter. Where the calculator has applied an uplift for that, it says so.

Six things about possession that changed in May and are still being got wrong

These are not marginal. Four of them will lose you a claim you have already paid the court fee for, and two of them carry a penalty larger than the arrears you were chasing.

Every claim

Now needs a hearing

The accelerated procedure was a section 21 route and section 21 is gone. There is no longer a paper track for a private landlord, so every possession claim gets listed. That is the single biggest driver of the new timeline, and it is why the published medians understate what you should expect.

Deposit

Now blocks every ground but two

Deposit non-compliance used to be a section 21 problem only. It is now an absolute bar to a possession order on every ground except the two anti-social behaviour ones. If the deposit was protected late, or the prescribed information never went out, you have no claim until it is fixed — and paying £415 to find that out at a hearing is an expensive way to learn it.

Gas, EPC

No longer block possession

The gas safety certificate bar, the EPC and the How to Rent guide were all creatures of section 21, and they died with it. They remain legal obligations with their own penalties, and you should still comply — but on the current reading they no longer stop a possession claim. A lot of advice still says otherwise.

3 months

Not two, and four weeks' notice not two

The serious arrears ground now needs three months’ arrears on a monthly tenancy, or thirteen weeks on a weekly one, and four weeks’ notice. It is still mandatory, but the arrears must be at the threshold at the hearing as well as at service — so a tenant who pays down a fortnight before the date defeats it. Always plead the discretionary arrears grounds alongside it.

12 months

Before you can sell or move in, and 12 after

The sale and moving-in grounds cannot take effect in the first twelve months of the tenancy and need four months’ notice — so in practice you serve at month eight at the earliest. Then, having used one, you cannot re-let or re-market for twelve months, short lets included. Breaching that is an offence with a penalty up to £40,000.

Two years

Of rent, if you get it wrong

Rent repayment orders now reach twenty-four months’ rent, up from twelve, with a two-year window to apply — and superior landlords and company directors are now exposed, which they were not. Unlawful eviction triggers one, and so does misusing a possession ground. On a £1,650 flat that is £39,600 against arrears of a few thousand.

The thing that ends worse than losing the claim

Almost every landlord who ends up prosecuted got there through frustration rather than malice, at the point where the process had already taken six months and the arrears had stopped mattering. It is worth knowing exactly where the line is before you get near it.

Changing the locks is a criminal offence

Unlawfully depriving a residential occupier of occupation — or attempting to — is an offence carrying up to two years’ imprisonment and an unlimited fine on indictment. So is a course of conduct likely to interfere with their peace or comfort, or persistently withdrawing services, intended to make them leave.

The version usually charged is the landlord variant, which needs only that you knew or had reasonable cause to believe the conduct was likely to have that effect. You do not have to have intended it.

And the council can fine you £40,000 without prosecuting

Local authorities can impose a financial penalty of up to £40,000 for illegal eviction or harassment as an alternative to prosecution, raised from £30,000 for anything on or after 1 May 2026. That is a civil decision on the balance of probabilities, not a criminal trial.

On top sits a rent repayment order of up to two years’ rent, and civil damages. It is entirely possible to end up worse off by five figures than if you had written the arrears off on day one.

What the civil damages actually look like

The statutory measure is the difference between what your interest is worth with the tenant in and with vacant possession — which for a modern assured tenant is often small, sometimes a few hundred pounds. That is the figure people quote to reassure themselves.

It is not the figure that gets awarded. Reported awards against landlords of assured shorthold tenants run from around £500 to £19,000 once general damages for lost accommodation and distress, and aggravated damages for indignity, are added. Against tenants with stronger security they run far higher.

The only safe answer, and it is dull

Serve the right notice on the right form with the right expiry date, and if it runs out, issue. Do not accept keys informally, do not enter to “check” the property, do not remove belongings, do not disconnect anything, and do not send a single message that could be read as pressure to go.

If the relationship has reached the point where that feels difficult, hand it to somebody who has no emotional investment in it. That is the honest case for using an agent on this, and it is a better one than speed.

What we charge, and the line we will not cross

Everything below is pre-action work, which is not a reserved legal activity. We do not issue or conduct proceedings and we do not appear at hearings — that goes to a regulated firm you pay directly, so there is no margin in it for us and no reason for us to steer you toward court.

Work it out yourself
Freeand you may not need us
Every ground, every notice period, mandatory or discretionary
The document list, and what bars a claim outright
A realistic date, and the cost with lost rent in it
The break-even against paying them to leave
No form, nothing stored, no account
Before you serve anything
£195compliance audit
The deposit position — now an absolute bar on almost every ground
Whether the ground you want is open on your actual dates
The agreement, the licensing position, anything outstanding
A written answer on whether to proceed at all
Cheaper than discovering it at a hearing seven months in
Notice and evidence
£295served, or £650 for the bundle
Drafted on the current prescribed form, with a defensible expiry date
Proper evidence of service — the commonest evidential gap there is
Reconciled rent schedule, chronology and correspondence
Assembled so a solicitor can issue on day one, not bill you to build it
Multiple grounds pleaded where they are available
Or the cheaper route
£450and only if they actually go
Negotiated surrender, in writing, with a date in it
Payable on vacant possession, not on the attempt
Because charging for the attempt would give us the wrong incentive
Usually faster and cheaper than an order — the tool shows you when
Arrears written off in the same document where they are not recoverable

This is a calculator, not legal advice, and it is not a substitute for a solicitor. It applies published notice periods, court fees and possession statistics to what you enter. It cannot read your tenancy agreement, weigh your evidence, or predict a district judge. Court fees are the figures in force from 13 July 2026 — £415 to issue in the county court, £152 for a warrant. Court timings are the last published Ministry of Justice medians and they pre-date the 1 May 2026 reforms, and are weighted by paper-based accelerated claims that no longer exist for private landlords. We add an uplift to the claim-to-order stage for the hearing that every claim now requires, and label it as an estimate. Nobody yet knows the real post-reform figure. Market prices for legal work are observed ranges, not a survey and not a quote. They predate the full effect of every claim needing a hearing, so expect upward pressure. Two points of genuine legal uncertainty are flagged in the tool rather than smoothed over: whether a deposit failure can be cured up to the hearing or must be cured before service, and whether an unlicensed property bars a claim on a ground as it used to bar a section 21 notice. Specialist opinion differs on both. Where it matters to you, take advice on your facts rather than relying on any website, including this one.

Send us the numbers and we will tell you whether to proceed

The rent, the arrears, when the tenancy started and where the deposit is. We will tell you which grounds are actually open, whether anything bars the claim, and — more often than landlords expect — whether a surrender is the better answer. If the honest advice is not to go to court, that is what you will get.

Usually within a few hoursMonday to SaturdayFree to askQuote before anything startsNo lock-inCancel monthly services any time

Related services

Every one of these has a free tool on it. None of them asks for your details before it gives you an answer.

Questions landlords ask us first

The pre-action half of it, yes, and we would rather explain the line than blur it. Serving a notice is not a reserved legal activity, and neither is auditing your compliance, building the evidence or negotiating a surrender. Issuing the claim, running it and appearing at the hearing are reserved, and doing them without authorisation is an offence under the Legal Services Act carrying up to two years on indictment, plus contempt of court. In Baxter v Doble the High Court looked at an unregulated eviction firm’s work in the round — drafting the papers, the witness statements, the applications, instructing the advocate, running the correspondence — and held that together it amounted to conducting litigation, even though the landlord was nominally acting in person and the firm never went on the record. The judge said it would be “wholly artificial” to pretend the client had done it himself. That firm escaped sanction only through a defence that turned on the law being unsettled at the time, and it is not unsettled now. So: we do the notice, the compliance and the bundle, and a regulated firm issues and runs it. You pay a solicitor once, for the part that needs one. Any firm that is not a firm of solicitors and offers to take the whole thing off your hands for a fixed fee is describing something a High Court judge has already said they may not do — ask them which regulator they answer to before you instruct them.

The list is shorter than it was and one item on it has moved, which is catching people out. Deposit non-compliance is now an absolute bar to a possession order on every ground except the two anti-social behaviour ones. Under the old regime it only ever affected a section 21 notice, so a great many landlords have filed it mentally under “no longer relevant”. It is more relevant than it has ever been. If the deposit was protected outside thirty days, or the prescribed information never went out, you do not have a claim until you either fix it or return the deposit in full — and our advice is to do that before you serve the notice, because there is authority both ways on whether a later cure saves an earlier notice and you do not want to be the case that settles it. An outstanding prohibited payment under the Tenant Fees Act bars possession the same way until it is repaid. What no longer bars possession, and this surprises people in the other direction: the gas safety certificate, the EPC and the How to Rent guide. Those were all creatures of section 21 and they died with it. They remain legal obligations with their own penalties and you should still comply — but on the current reading they will not stop a claim on a ground.

Longer than the published figure, and the published figure is already six months. The last Ministry of Justice medians put claim to order at eight weeks, order to warrant at about eight more, and warrant to actual repossession at nine and a half — roughly twenty-six weeks from issuing to getting the keys. Two things make that an understatement. First, it is a pre-reform median: it covers a period ending a month before the new regime started. Second, and more importantly, it is weighted by accelerated paper claims that no longer exist for private landlords. Nearly a third of the claims in that sample were decided without a hearing. Now every private possession claim is listed, so the claim-to-order leg has to lengthen. Our calculator adds six weeks to that stage and labels it as an estimate, because nobody yet knows the real number — the first quarter containing post-reform data has only just been published and a meaningful read will not exist until late in the year. Then add the notice period on top, which is four weeks for arrears and four months for a sale or moving in. The honest headline is that a private landlord starting today should be planning for something between seven and ten months, not six.

Because on most sets of numbers we have run, it is cheaper, and it would be dishonest to build a possession calculator that hides the arithmetic. The court route costs you the fee, the enforcement, the legal work and — overwhelmingly the largest item — every month of rent you do not receive while it runs. On a £1,650 property over seven months that is well over £11,000 of lost rent against a court fee of £415. You will recover about £530 in fixed costs, on paper, from a person who by definition has no money. So the break-even against a negotiated surrender is usually a five-figure sum, and a tenant who is going to have to move anyway will very often take a fraction of it to go in a fortnight. Three warnings, because this is where it goes wrong. It must be a written surrender with a date in it — handing keys back is not a surrender on its own, and a landlord who accepts keys and re-lets without a signed agreement has manufactured a claim against himself. Do not pay before it is signed. And do not use it as leverage: conduct intended to make somebody give up occupation is a criminal offence whether or not money changes hands, and an offer that arrives alongside a threat is exactly that.

Not for the mandatory ground any more. The threshold rose on 1 May 2026 from two months to three months on a monthly tenancy, or thirteen weeks on a weekly one, and the notice period rose from two weeks to four. It is still a mandatory ground, meaning the judge must make the order if it is proved — but there is a catch that costs landlords their claim regularly: the arrears must be at the threshold on the day of the hearing as well as on the day you served. A tenant who scrapes together a payment the week before the date drops you below three months and the mandatory ground evaporates in the hearing room. That is why you never plead it alone. The discretionary arrears grounds carry the same four weeks’ notice, survive a part payment, and put the decision in the judge’s hands rather than making it automatic. Two months’ arrears today gives you those, right now. One more thing worth checking before you count the balance: arrears attributable to Universal Credit the tenant was entitled to but did not receive do not count towards the serious arrears ground. If part of this is a payment failure rather than a tenant failure, a managed payment to landlord fixes the cause for nothing and is faster than any court.

Yes, on the sale ground, and there are three constraints people discover in the wrong order. It is mandatory, so proof gets you the order. It needs four months’ notice. And it cannot take effect in the first twelve months of the tenancy — measured to the date the notice expires, not the date you serve — so on a tenancy that began less than eight months ago you cannot usefully serve at all yet. Then the constraint that follows you afterwards: having used the sale or moving-in ground, you may not re-let or even re-market the property for twelve months, and that expressly includes short lets and holiday lets. It binds your agent as well as you, and breaching it is an offence with a penalty of up to £40,000. So if the actual plan is to get vacant possession and put it back on the market at a higher rent, this ground is not the tool, and using it that way is knowingly using a ground the court would not have granted — which is separately penalised and now triggers a rent repayment order of up to two years’ rent. If you genuinely are selling, the other question worth asking is whether you need vacant possession at all: a tenanted sale to an investor is slower to price but avoids four months of notice, seven months of process and a year of restriction.

You commit a criminal offence, and it is the single most expensive mistake available to a landlord. Unlawfully depriving a residential occupier of occupation — or attempting to — carries up to two years’ imprisonment and an unlimited fine on indictment, and so does a course of conduct likely to interfere with their peace or comfort, or persistently withdrawing services, done to make them leave. The version usually charged against landlords requires only that you knew or had reasonable cause to believe the conduct was likely to have that effect; it does not require that you intended it. Separately, the council can impose a financial penalty of up to £40,000 without prosecuting anybody, on the balance of probabilities. On top of that sits a rent repayment order of up to two years’ rent — nearly £40,000 on a £1,650 flat — and civil damages, where reported awards against landlords of assured tenants run from a few hundred pounds to around £19,000 once general and aggravated damages are added. Add it up and it is entirely possible to end a few thousand pounds of arrears by putting yourself sixty thousand pounds down. If the relationship has reached the point where locks are a tempting thought, that is the moment to hand it to somebody with no emotional stake in it.

Sometimes, and we would rather give you the honest version than the marketed one. The county court bailiff route costs roughly £480 all in. Transferring to a High Court Enforcement Officer costs roughly £1,600 to £2,100 once the transfer application and the enforcement fee are in, so three to four times the price. The published median from warrant to actual repossession by a county court bailiff is nine and a half weeks, and High Court enforcement is very widely marketed as materially faster. It probably is. But we could not find a single independent, quantified comparison, so we are not going to put a number on it, and neither should anyone selling it to you. Do the arithmetic yourself with your own rent: if you are losing £380 a week, saving six weeks is worth £2,280 and the premium pays for itself twice over; if the property is low-rent or the tenant is likely to leave on the order anyway, it does not. Two practical notes. Transfer is not automatic — the county court has a discretion and you have to ask, usually at the hearing, which is much easier than asking afterwards. And the claim that judges never allow it is a myth; they frequently do, when asked properly and at the right moment.

£195 for the pre-action compliance audit, and it is the cheapest money on this page because it is the money that stops you paying a £415 court fee for a claim that cannot succeed. We check the deposit position and the prescribed information, the tenancy agreement, whether the ground you want is actually open on your dates, and whether anything outstanding bars possession. £295 to draft and serve the notice on the correct prescribed form with a defensible expiry date and proper evidence of service. £650 for the full evidence bundle — reconciled rent schedule, service evidence, chronology, correspondence — put together so a solicitor can issue from it on day one instead of billing you to assemble it. And £450 for a negotiated surrender, payable only if they actually leave, because charging for an attempt would give us the wrong incentive on the one route that is usually cheapest for you. What we do not do is issue or run the claim; that goes to a regulated firm and you pay them directly, so there is no margin on it for us and no reason for us to push you toward court. Everything is fixed and quoted before anything starts.

The cheapest possession is usually the one you do not go to court for.

That is an odd thing for a firm that sells possession services to put at the bottom of its own page. But once the lost rent is in the arithmetic, a written surrender agreed in a fortnight beats an order obtained in seven months on almost every set of numbers we have run — and the calculator above will tell you the exact figure at which it stops being true for you.

Talk to us on WhatsApp